Why File Transfers Between China and Hong Kong Are Often Blocked: Five Key Strategies to Avoid Compliance Pitfalls

The Reality of Censorship in Cross-Border Data Transfer Between Mainland China and Hong Kong

DingTalk's file-sharing security is often seen as a reliable safeguard for corporate collaboration. However, when operations extend across borders—particularly from Hong Kong to mainland China—its security faces fundamental challenges. The issue does not lie with the technology itself, but rather with the legal jurisdiction governing the data. As an Alibaba-owned platform, DingTalk stores most of its data on servers located in mainland China and must comply with regulations such as the Cybersecurity Law and the Measures for the Security Administration of Data出境. This means that even if the sender is based in Hong Kong, once files are routed through systems within mainland China, their contents may fall under regulatory scrutiny.

Cross-border transfer between Hong Kong and mainland China is essentially a clash of institutional frameworks, not merely a geographical transition. Triggers for sensitive keywords, account anomaly detection, or administrative cooperation with authorities in retrieving records are not unfounded rumors. Industries such as finance, law, and media need to be especially cautious—a seemingly ordinary contract or report involving overseas funds, political expressions, or personal privacy could be intercepted or traced without warning. Ironically, the more a service promotes "enterprise-grade encryption," the more compliance interfaces it may have ready for activation behind the scenes.

Therefore, the true definition of DingTalk’s file-sharing security depends on the user’s context: for compliant enterprises, it acts as a protective shield; for users seeking free information flow, it may instead function as an invisible surveillance network. Recognizing this contradiction is the first step toward developing effective data transfer strategies.

The Technical Foundation of File-Sharing Security

DingTalk’s file-sharing security is not a myth—it is built upon a technical architecture combining multiple layers of encryption and access control. From TLS 1.3 at the transport layer to AES-256 encryption for data at rest, the entire system ensures that data travels as securely as if transported in an armored vehicle. However, there are clear differences between versions: the free tier offers only basic protection, while enterprise plans unlock advanced controls such as watermark tracking, download restrictions, and link expiration settings.

One frequently overlooked aspect is enabling administrator approval workflows and audit logging. In the event of a data leak, the absence of complete audit trails makes it impossible to trace responsibility. One financial institution experienced an internal breach when an employee used a personal account to share an unreleased earnings report, which was then stolen. Without watermarks to identify the source, the incident triggered a crisis of trust. Mitigation measures include mandatory dynamic permission assignment, two-factor authentication, and geolocation-based IP access restrictions—especially critical for teams regularly conducting cross-border transfers between Hong Kong and mainland China.

The real risk does not come from hackers, but from overreliance on convenience. When employees think “just sharing briefly” is harmless, even the most robust DingTalk security mechanisms become meaningless. Technology is merely a tool; its effectiveness depends on whether organizations cultivate a culture of compliance.

Real-Life Tragedies in Cross-Border Transfers

Mistakes in cross-border data transfers often lead to irreversible losses. An international law firm once used DingTalk to securely send case documents from Hong Kong to a partner firm in Guangdong, only for the files to mysteriously “disappear.” The recipient claimed they never received them, ultimately delaying litigation and prompting client complaints. In another case, a startup founder uploaded a business plan to DingTalk for sharing, and within a month, a partner launched a nearly identical product—even replicating the user interface design. On the surface, this appeared to be a technical flaw, but it actually exposed weaknesses in access management and the recipient’s lack of compliance awareness.

Technically speaking, even with TLS and AES encryption, setting shared links to permanent availability and granting full access to all members is equivalent to leaving the key under the doormat. More seriously, employees often mistakenly believe that “sharing within an internal group” guarantees safety, leading them to forward HR files containing personal data. Such actions violate Hong Kong’s Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance and breach the red lines set by mainland China’s Personal Information Protection Law, exposing companies to joint legal liability.

The common thread in these incidents is not external attacks, but a “speed-over-safety” culture overriding proper procedures. When efficiency becomes the sole metric, even the most advanced DingTalk security systems cannot withstand human error. Institutional gaps are far deadlier than technical flaws.

Five Principles for Compliant Data Transfer

Facing the complexity of cross-border transfers, only a systematic compliance framework can enable true best practices. The primary principle is implementing a document sensitivity classification system—client contracts, financial reports, and HR data should not be handled the same way. Highly sensitive files should disable instant sharing and instead adopt a “pre-approval + time-limited link” model to minimize exposure windows.

Secondly, while end-to-end encryption is important, pairing it with password-protected ZIP compression creates a “dual-lock mechanism.” Third, avoid relying solely on one platform. A recommended strategy separates data storage from communication: store files on internationally trusted end-to-end encrypted cloud services like Proton Drive or Tresorit, then use DingTalk only to notify recipients of access links, thereby reducing overall risk.

Fourth, establish a detailed permission matrix clearly defining “who can view, who can download, and when access automatically expires,” preventing annual financial reports from being accessible to all staff with a single click. Finally, conduct regular simulated data breach drills to test employees’ ability to detect suspicious requests, and fully log every transfer for traceability. This set of principles protects not only against external threats but also prevents internal staff from inadvertently breaking the law.

Alternative Solutions and Future Trends

Beyond DingTalk, alternatives include Microsoft Teams, Google Workspace, WeChat Work, and Feishu. However, each tool’s compliance boundary is determined by where its data sovereignty lies. DingTalk and Feishu host data on mainland Chinese servers, placing them fully under Chinese jurisdiction. While Google and Microsoft hold international certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2, uncertainty remains regarding data localization within China, making adoption difficult for Chinese teams.

WeChat Work appears widely used, but its opaque censorship mechanisms mean files can vanish unexpectedly. DingTalk, backed by Alibaba, offers relative stability, yet still operates within the national regulatory framework. Looking ahead, China’s push for “digital RMB + blockchain certification” may tie document signing histories to domestically developed blockchain systems, enhancing compliance traceability—but also intensifying debates over data autonomy.

Although the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area has announced pilot programs for data circulation, progress so far has been more rhetoric than reality. Foreign-invested enterprises should adopt zero-trust architectures combined with international platforms. Domestic Chinese firms may continue using DingTalk but must strengthen cross-border access controls. Joint ventures should proactively deploy multi-layered encrypted bridging solutions. Only through such approaches can genuine best practices in cross-border data transfer be achieved amid an unstable environment.

We dedicated to serving clients with professional DingTalk solutions. If you'd like to learn more about DingTalk platform applications, feel free to contact our online customer service or email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. With a skilled development and operations team and extensive market experience, we’re ready to deliver expert DingTalk services and solutions tailored to your needs!