The Nail Department: From Absurd Inspiration to the Miracle of an Efficient Organization

When Adam Smith praised how division of labor could send factory efficiency soaring in The Wealth of Nations, he probably never imagined that two centuries later someone would extract "nailing nails" from the broader process of renovation and establish a formal department complete with KPI evaluations, budget allocations, and annual reports. This isn’t a joke—it’s an actual organizational oddity found in some multinational corporations: employees dedicated solely to tightening screws, others assigned only to affix labels, and even companies employing an “Office Beverage Coordinator” whose job is to ensure coffee machines are full and sugar packets adequately stocked.

Peter Drucker once reminded us: “Efficiency is doing things right; effectiveness is doing the right things.” But when every action is subdivided to absurd extremes, organizations fall into a paradox of correct procedures yielding ridiculous outcomes. Functional specialization was meant to enhance expertise, yet within power structures and battles over budgets, it has mutated into fertile ground for bureaucratic proliferation. A single nail now passes through three hands and five approval stages—not due to technical complexity, but because the system demands “visible busyness.” This isn’t efficiency improvement; it’s stagnation wrapped in professionalism.

When the “Nail Department” officially opens its doors, the bureaucrat’s nail is driven deep into the organization’s bones. Something that originally required only a hammer, one nail, and three seconds now begins with a submission of the “Feasibility Report on Nail Requirements,” followed by procurement comparisons, asset management reviews, risk assessments from compliance and safety divisions, and finally executive sign-off—spanning three hierarchical levels and five forms. Efficiency is nailed down, immobilized on flowcharts. Max Weber once described the ideal bureaucracy as rational, professional, and predictable. But in reality, once systems begin self-replicating, KPIs generate meetings, meetings spawn documents, and documents justify new positions. Thus, “nailing a nail” ceases to be an action and becomes an ecosystem requiring constant maintenance. This department doesn’t nail walls—it nails people: nailing shut creativity, slowing responses, and crippling flexibility. We chase control but lose agility; we reinforce specialization but abandon common sense. More absurdly, whenever someone complains about lengthy processes, the reply is always: “That’s because you didn’t complete the standard operating procedure.” Even the nail itself now requires a “Post-Use Nail Impact Tracking Form.”

When “nailing a nail” evolves from a simple strike against a wall into a shiny new box on the organizational chart, the real drama begins. Whoever holds the hammer gains control of the microphone in the conference room—not necessarily because they drive the nail most accurately, but because they now have staffing quotas, a budget, and a dedicated nail inventory management system. This isn’t logistical advancement; it’s a restructuring of power. A savvy manager knows that institutionalizing a task previously handled casually by an administrative assistant is equivalent to implanting their own organ into the organization’s circulatory system. Drawing from organizational behavior theory on “empire building,” this isn’t mere expansion—it’s colonization: using nails to draw boundaries, wrapping control instincts in KPI packaging.

Thus, the nail ceases to be a tool and becomes a totem. Every cross-departmental collaboration must now seek permission from the “Nail Office”; every repair budget undergoes scrutiny by the Nail Committee. On the surface, it's professional specialization; in truth, it's a monopoly on话语权 (discursive power). Who decides which wall deserves a nail? Who defines the “strategic value” of a nail? Behind these questions lies a silent coup: wielding power under the guise of efficiency. When the hammer falls, it secures not just wood—but also silences dissent.

“We haven’t failed to try eliminating the Nail Department,” a corporate executive chuckled bitterly, “the problem is, when you propose cutting it, they immediately submit an ‘Annual White Paper on Nail Efficiency Optimization.’” This isn’t just a punchline—it reflects a real dilemma for many organizations. Once a function is sanctified, even its dissolution demands a press conference. True courage, however, lies not in how many departments you create, but in whether you dare to disband them.

Lean management teaches us: value isn’t found in “someone nailing a nail,” but in “whether the nail improves the product.” If the nail itself becomes the purpose, then collectively, we’ve already developed organizational dementia. The essence of agile organizations is precisely to break this functional myth—letting engineers nail a nail on the spot solves a crooked wall faster than forming a committee. Why can Silicon Valley teams iterate overnight? Because they don’t ask “Which department should handle this?” but rather “Who can fix it?”

Dissolving a department is harder than creating one, as it challenges vested interests and emotional security. Yet process audits, functional consolidation, and retraining represent the three chisels of gentle revolution. Remember: some nails simply shouldn’t exist.

Only when the “Nail Department” shifts from satire to reality do we realize: organizational absurdity often begins with an overly serious “good idea.” Division of labor was meant to boost efficiency, but when it turns into dogma—when each nail needs its own specialist, every screw requires triple approvals—structure collapses from tool into prison. This isn’t management; it’s ritual. Not operation; performance.

The Tao Te Ching says: “Governing a large country is like cooking a small fish”—don’t flip it too often, or it will fall apart. Managing a company is no different. Excessive specialization is like flipping the fish daily until only fragments remain. True wisdom isn’t measured by how many departments you set up, but by whether your nails are struck just right: securing the framework without tripping your own people. The golden rule of moderate specialization is simple—whenever creating a new role, ask: Is this person nailing a beam into place, or are they nailing our own feet?

Rather than chasing perfect division, aim for dynamic balance. Let departments emerge and dissolve naturally, like breathing. After all, the most dangerous nail isn’t the crooked one—it’s the one that long serves no purpose, yet remains firmly lodged in the heart of the organization, too intimidating for anyone to pull out.

We dedicated to serving clients with professional DingTalk solutions. If you'd like to learn more about DingTalk platform applications, feel free to contact our online customer service or email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. With a skilled development and operations team and extensive market experience, we’re ready to deliver expert DingTalk services and solutions tailored to your needs!